Who It's For: New or seasoned community-engaged researchers who are looking to better understand the role of ethics boards in CER and how to navigate the more complex issues that arise from the tensions in ideologies and methods between traditional and CER.

Why We Love It: This resource draws on the author's experience to highlight the differences in ideologies and methods between traditional and CER. You'll learn how these differences impact the questions asked and answer, how people are represented, and the material conditions of people's lives. It offers helpful recommendations for making research more inclusive and ethically sound.

Citation: McCracken, J. (2020). Ethics as obligation: Reconciling diverging research practices with marginalized communities. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920964336.